🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the state government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this international debate continues, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.