🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about the comments made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and powerful power on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter men. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive effort to win it. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact extremely improbable for all other players. {